![]() |
i think the big one went 55 max. others look 30-40.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
good call Dorado50. |
Quote:
Whatever...why waste the call to us? Jim |
Clout=kooks.
Legal or not. |
The reasons I reposted this are because he does appear to be alone in the skiff. Even if he is carrying fish for a kayak friend, that is illegal (possession). And I have personally witnessed this guy keep fishing WSB right through his limit, although not witnessed him keeping overlimits. I have heard of dumb things before, but a commercial fisherman giving away his spot (even it it were for next year) would be right up there on top?
|
Quote:
Kind of silly to risk a ticket, toting somebody else's catch. If that yakker would have caught 2 WSB by himself, he would have had to figure out how to get them back ashore on his own, which is what he should have done. Aaron |
Quote:
|
I'm pretty sure DFG would have to catch him in possession to do anything about it.
|
We're still talking about this?
Don't we have better ways of making use of our time? I've carried fish on my PA for people who hit limits of WSB on an Outback and couldn't handle the capacity. Consider me guilty of possession laws. I can think of two people right now that I know have gone out on a Monday and caught limits of WSB, then again on Tuesday during that wide open June bite. You're telling me you don't know of anyone... wink wink? Those people "ate" or "gave away" 30# of filets in 20 hours? That's a violation of the law, but I don't see them on blast. You've admitted you've witnesses him fish through limits, but never seen him keep more than limits. Quote:
The day someone catches him breaking the law, I vote for full on street justice, but until then, you're bordering on the line of defamation if you label this guy a poacher with no real evidence. (Not directed at you Greg) defamation (of character) n. the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. If the defamatory statement is printed or broadcast over the media it is libel and, if only oral, it is slander. Public figures, including officeholders and candidates have to show that the defamation was made with malicious intent and was not just fair comment. Damages for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malice. Some statements such as an accusation of having committed a crime having a feared disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are called libel per se or slander and can more easily lead to large money awards in court and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Most states provide for a demand for a printed retraction of defamation and only allow a lawsuit if there is no such admission of error. As I said, you're bordering on it because it might not be "Intentional" but the internet if a powerful thing, and once something is on the internet it's pretty much there for good, at least the impact it has had on the viewers of the thread is. This guy might be a kook, a weirdo, a general piece of shit... but if you're putting him in the category of being a law breaker without any sound evidence, you are in fact breaking a law of it's own. This man owns a business, and these "rumors" or "accusations" could potentially effect that business which launches him well within the realm of being able to consider pursuing charges of defamation. If it were me on the other end, I would take you to court and fuck you six ways from sunday. Delete this post and lets all move forward. |
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I could be wrong but I think George grew up in Malibu and has been making boards in Malibu for something like 30 years. I mean I get it. He posted a video of fish caught in Malibu. THAT ALONE IS A CRIME!!! :D No doubt this will lead to everyone in America fishing there. Ha ha ha... We have an eye witness. They say he only kept his legal limit that day. He's not a criminal. He's local, a life long resident, why the lynch mob? |
Jim the lynch mob is not directed at you for once...:eek: sit back and enjoy somebody else other than you getting shit....:luxhello:
|
Innocent until proven guilty - but based on the sick brag it's reasonable to cause a level of suspicion.
dfg - cite this law abiding fisherman to the fullest extent based on the video, confiscate his kayak and fishing gear. Search his fridge and present the evidence to the judge. Let this law abiding fisherman prove his innocence to the judge. p.s - if you ever see this guy in our local waters watch this law abiding fisherman like a hawk. Innocent until proven guilty............ |
Lynchmob for excessive douchery.
Check his vid below pulling abalone in SoCal. Even if it's staged, it's still illegal and makes all consumptives look bad to those wanting to ban all fishing in CA. Guy is looking for internet fame and a reality tv show. Lose the bandana and sunglasses ftard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSU81ARxA1c |
Quote:
The law does not say that you cannot catch 5 fish, it says you cannot posses more than 3 fish. There is a witness that puts him in the boat alone. He is breaking the law, so there is no defamation nor libel. |
Quote:
Another witness put his son on the boat. Who is right? It's not for us to decide, nor jump to a conclusion, additionally, the initial accusations came prior to a witness testimony. I agree without you 100% on the difference between survival rates of WSB and paddie fishing. However, the regs don't account for a "survival rate" of fishing. There are two sides to this scenario. What is morally right and wrong, and whats it legally right and wrong. You can say all you want this guy is a scum bag for keeping so many fish, but to say he's a poacher is another story. One is an opinion, one is an accusation. I'm not trying to be an ass, I'm actually trying to look out for the hotheaded, pitchfork wielding forum-goers who might put their foot in their mouth. This guy could be screen shotting everything we type and it's not exactly like our identities are a secret. I don't agree with what this guy did, but that doesn't make it right for us to put him on trial. Like I said, the internet is disgustingly powerful. This thread spread like wildfire over 4 known other local forums. If this guy turns out to be innocent, which he very well may be, then think of the damage it could do. Maybe 5% who saw the initial video will know the truth, society wants to see a beheading in Time Square more than an acquittal of charges. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.