Quote:
Originally Posted by zenspearo
This ain't the case with the enviro-nazis running around boycotting dive boats that take spearos out. It's been that way for a few years..... We spearos fought like hell because our backs were against the wall. They were going to exterminate our sport by taking all accessible spearing spots. We had nowhere else to go.
|
I didn't mean that in a negative manner.
Everyone is fighting as hard as they can.. Kayakers have fought like hell because their backs were against the wall as well.
What I was trying to say is that for the politicians it is all about money.
I think you guys might of got a break on the Farnsworth due to the dive boats that utilise that area, and more power to you if you did.
It wouldn't surprise me if they did not actively work for you in a obvious way, but Farnsowrth will have some spearo access , and the guys that spear at the Farnsworth get there on a Diveboat, charter or spend a lot on fuel in their own boat to get there. That's money spent to fish there and it's about keeping it open so people will spend that money.
Kayaking is a relatively newand unlike the landings, charter boats, fuel concessions and other obvious economic interests, with the exception few locations we can't show actual businesses that will loose money if we get forced out of a given area.
At Farnsworth there were some that could say you close this area we'll loose money, and I honestly think that's the reason they left it open to some forms of spearfishing.
Kayakers couldn't do that, not at Farnsworth, not even at my local kayak hotspot BKR at Point Dume.
If BKR get's closed and they push the kaykers out of there it's not going to hurt any businesses in Malibu. The local businessmen could care less whether I launch at Esco, Malibu pier or at County line.
The sportboats could care less because it's too far from MDR or King Harbor and even the PB guys from MDR hardly fish it so the fuel docks could care less as well.
However those dozen multi million dollar homes on the hill behind BKR have been trying to keep outsiders off their beach for years. Ever see those paparazzi conflicts where some media star slugs a cameraman on the beach? Well that is the beach at BKR. They do not anyone who does not live there on their beach or in their water.
That's what that closure is about. Those rich Fs have lots of money to throw around in Malibu, plenty to spend on campaign contributions to politicians, or even contributions to the environmental groups, so in the end they get their beach closed to the public (riff raff) and we kayakers and the local Spearos who hunt there get the boot.
The Spearos have more options in Malibu then Kaykers because they have better access to the North then we do in times of larger surf. So the kayakers get screwed the worst, but it was still ultimately all about money.
Compare that to Rocky Point.... Rich houses there as well but they are way up on a cliff and there's no beach there, so they could care less.
It's five miles from King Harbor so all the King Harbor Sport boats hit it every day, usually several times a day. The King Harbor and the MDR PB fleet fish it as well pretty much daily. That's lots of money changing hands in fuel food and sportboats.
Every time a bite goes off at Rocky the fuel guys at MDR make a killing because it's close enough everyone goes but far enough away that they burn a shitload of fuel. So when it came to closing Rocky point the money interests: two separate harbors, two fuel docks, sportboats from both harbors, and then the City of Redondo were against a closure and it stayed open.
At Dume with BKR only the Kaykers and Spearo freedivers were there against the closure and we got reamed. At Rocky they had business and money interest behind them and they kept their area open.
Like I said: Bottom line it's all about the money.
Jim