Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-10-2009, 09:50 AM   #3
PAL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
Those maps are hard to read. WG 2 has the lightest impact - no additional closures at all.

In the LJ area:

WG1 - reserve and SMCA at south LJ. Plus a big reserve at N Pt Loma. Can you say compaction? This group is not done; still arguing over north SD county.

WG2 - existing closure only at LJ. SAT guidelines met with north Pt Loma reserve

WG3 - closes south LJ thru Crystal Pier. No closure at Pt Loma. Enlarges existing LJ closures enlarged, bait only at the pier.
PAL is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.