'Illusion of plenty' masking collapse of 2 key Southern California fisheries - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

Phatford · 09-27-2011, 11:09 AM

I doubt Scripps would risk their reputation on shaky science... The mention Environment in the beginning article. You can't get a good feel for what all they measured in a few short paragraphs and certainly can't fit 30 years of data on one page.

There is no doubt changes need to be made in my mind, but what kind of fair changes can we help make? Calling every study bad science is not going to help our cause. Pretending we are catching the same quality of fish we used to catch is also bad science or poor memory... ha ha

But it's a damn good thing we have people out there saving the seals... oh wait!

09-27-2011, 11:09 AM	#6
Phatford Heroes on the Water Staff Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Anahiem Posts: 176	I doubt Scripps would risk their reputation on shaky science... The mention Environment in the beginning article. You can't get a good feel for what all they measured in a few short paragraphs and certainly can't fit 30 years of data on one page. There is no doubt changes need to be made in my mind, but what kind of fair changes can we help make? Calling every study bad science is not going to help our cause. Pretending we are catching the same quality of fish we used to catch is also bad science or poor memory... ha ha But it's a damn good thing we have people out there saving the seals... oh wait!