CDFG

[wiredantz]

I think they are trying to tell me something...

[jruiz]

They're mocking you Frank!! Show them you mean business!

[alanw]

Those cases refer to the right as a privilege, and seem to deal with fishing for profit.

[jorluivil]

And at the end of the day, or year, we will still go out and purchase our annual fishing license with ocean enhancement stamp.

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by jorluivil

And at the end of the day, or year, we will still go out and purchase our annual fishing license with ocean enhancement stamp.

Just to feed the MLPA machine!!!

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

[wiredantz]

After all the research i did... I am going to put it into perspective:

Liberties and rights before the constitution are still granted by the constitution...


When cases go up to the supreme court, they get to pick and choose their cases. Why?

The Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each Term. The Court grants and hears oral argument in about 80 cases. (a lot of the cases are so controversial that the supreme court rules them 5-4)


THERE IS NO WAY IN THE WORLD THERE GOING TO HEAR A CASE THAT WILL BREAK THE SYSTEM.



After all the research that i did, and the CDFW issues you a complaint.
The judge will ask you how do you plea?


You are not going to plea....

Your going to ask for a demur for a motion of dismiss with prejudice.

CDFW filed that complaint they have to prove they have jurisdiction over your right to restricted fishing.

that is going to cost them money to defend.



At the end of the day, the Judge does not want to be held liable for breaking the system so if you know your rights it will probably be dismissed.

and if it is dismissed you can submit your bill to the court for wages you lost, copies, faxes. etc....

But once again, take my words with a grain of salt...( im learning)


we still pay for registration of guns, mirage licenses, driver licenses,, and many other things.


im getting a fishing license...for 2017 unless i can claim i have a disability.


IF CDFW files the complaint ( citation) you have a right to trial by jury. They pay, you don't pay...
If you lose and want to appeal, then you pay....

correct me if im wrong...

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by wiredantz

After all the research i did... I am going to put it into perspective:

Liberties and rights before the constitution are still granted by the constitution...


When cases go up to the supreme court, they get to pick and choose their cases. Why?

The Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each Term. The Court grants and hears oral argument in about 80 cases. (a lot of the cases are so controversial that the supreme court rules them 5-4)


THERE IS NO WAY IN THE WORLD THERE GOING TO HEAR A CASE THAT WILL BREAK THE SYSTEM.



After all the research that i did, and the CDFW issues you a complaint.
The judge will ask you how do you plea?


You are not going to plea....

Your going to ask for a demur for a motion of dismiss.

CDFW filed that complaint they have to prove they have jurisdiction over your right to restricted fishing.

that is going to cost them money to defend.



At the end of the day, the Judge does not want to be held liable for breaking the system so if you know your rights it will probably be dismissed.


But once again, take my words with a grain of salt...( im learning)


we still pay for registration of guns, mirage licenses, driver licenses,, and many other things.


im getting a fishing license...for 2017 unless i can claim i have a disability.


IF CDFW files the complaint ( citation) you have a right to trial by jury. They pay, you don't pay...
If you lose and want to appeal, then you pay....

correct me if im wrong...

Agreed, they're not going to bite the hand that's feeding them. I'm not going to test it until I know how to file a lawsuit first. I'm down for taking risks, but a calculated risk is a little better than just winging it.



Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

[YakDout]

Originally Posted by jorluivil

And at the end of the day, or year, we will still go out and purchase our annual fishing license with ocean enhancement stamp.

Too bad we can't just buy the 5 buck ocean stamp. I never fish freshwater.

[wiredantz]

[IMG][/IMG]


This guy is an attorney and he says get your fishing license....

So it's going to be like 100 dollars soon with all those stamps...



[IMG][/IMG]



Here is a federal fishing act from 1950s


https://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/FASPORT.HTML

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by jruiz

They're mocking you Frank!! Show them you mean business!

No kidding. Their stupid asses have the very first case stating "fishing for profit". Who ever said anything about fishing for profit? SMH

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk