![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior
|
They actually cast great! If I were you I'd pick the sealine between those two and the sealine 40 instead of the 50, it feels much better since it's a narrower reel that holds plenty of line. One more thing get the lower speed, 4.6 i think, you'll thank me, way more torque, much easier to crank those toad fish!
What's your budget on the rod? Any blank rated to fish 30 to 40 pds string and around 7 feet should get the job done. Good luck! ![]() Last edited by Shortbite; 01-16-2010 at 11:18 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
|
I'm looking to spend up to $150 on the rod. What's the capacity of the 40?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior
|
You can load the sealine 40 with about 400 yards of 65pds spectra and add a 3 feet fluorcarbon topshot, way more than you ever need.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Ho
Posts: 1,382
|
The Sealine X 40 HA is the way to go. $119
280 yards of 30 mono, 17.5 lbs of drag, on the 4.9:1 ratio. Bulletproof - casts great - and has a carbon fiber drag upgrade available for $14 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
|
I'm guessing they hold up to salt water pretty well too, right?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Headshots Only
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 311
|
they rarely require maintenance, a sealed drag really helps.
that and they just never break. the only ones i've seen that didn't work were filled with sand. cleaned them out and they worked great.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|