![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Menifee
Posts: 2,509
|
Yep. Same thing I was told by a Lowrance Rep. Theirs have to be in the water.
__________________
”The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” ~Thomas Jefferson.........maybe ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,155
|
i have a humminbird 597 ci hd di and i use the grease through hall method. it hasn't been mounted any other way so i dont have a comparison.
through hall with grease seems to work fine. not big fan of goop
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Just the design of the Lowrance imaging Xducer would probably require something other than in hull mount. It looks like half a hot dog, split lengthwise, mounted on a flat plate. According to the Lowrance seminar at Fred Hall, Down Imaging has a limited use. It is not a cone angle like your sonar, it is a wide beam to the sides and very narrow front to back. It is very good for showing when you are exactly passing over structure, but will not tell you if you are approaching it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 1-2 miles off the point
Posts: 6,948
|
Quote:
![]() Most of you guys have meters I can not afford. ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|