![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,526
|
interesting
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,526
|
from navico
the total scan transducer is 83/200 kHz only . some guys prefer the 83/200 kHz. , but lets be real, most guys are running the 50/200 kHz. transducers. another thing pointed out was the vulnerability of the now more exposed plate. anyone want to comment? is anyone currently using side imagining with any amount of reasonable success? about 4-5 years ago i was running a hummingbird 898 si. that unit was the bomb. but the technology was different and the transducer was massive and came with too many drawbacks for kayak users.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
I have the lss2 transducer its like 11 inches long, and i mounted it on the spare cassette when i am in single kayak mode instead of tandem.1. I can just pull it out when im landing.
Another way i have seen people mount it, its over the side using a transducer arm, or on the rear rail mount. Makes bait easier to find, since it scans the sides. WHen water gets choppy, the water transducer reading also get super choppy. i like it, is it necessary: no but its just another tool to have.... I have some waypoints back from 2010 that have moved a bit due to gps trajectory or what not.... i now use the side scan to see where it moved too...
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|