![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 202
|
Just emailed Marti Emerald
People can also call their councilmember as well. You wont talk to them, but I know that when you call all you need to do is tell whoever answers the phone that you do not support the MLPA closures. The people answering the phones most likely have a spread sheet or something similar to keep track of all the calls so their councilmember knows what their community is saying. A tip on emails and letters...keep them brief and make your point in the first line. Most likely your email is being read by a staffer, and your email will go into a folder after they see you support or are against something. Not many government representatives read their mail and they usually have a staff member screen everything. Not saying don’t write a long well thought email, but even a simple "Mr. Councilmember, I don’t support XYZ, and I don’t think you should either" works. We area a tally to them. And ALWAYS include your name and address in an email so they know you are in their district.
__________________
if your brain had fists, you could only hurt yourself! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Ho
Posts: 1,382
|
I just called Donna Frye's office and they let me speak for 5 Minutes
(That more time than I was allotted in the Last 6 MLPA Meetings I have attended.) I was just told: They are accepting E Mails prior to the Meeting and will use those comments to make a decision. Please take the time to write to Ms. Frye, Tell Her how this will effect YOU. DonnaFrye@sandiego.gov |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||||||||||||
Señor member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,627
|
I know everyone is attending this meeting next week! But if you have not contacted your council person, please do so during your lunch!
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Carmel Valley
Posts: 105
|
Thanks for posting the emails.
Email sent C. Cary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 167
|
Guys,
The State AG's Office just clarified their position on what non-fishing activity is prohibited in a State Marine Reserve. Basically, any activity that "injure" to "any" living marine resource is a no-no in a State Marine Reserve unless it's "permitted research, restoration, and monitoring." This is a powerful argument with SD city council against SMRs in La Jolla (as in Group 3) and Point Loma. We should bring this up--if La Jolla and Point Loma is closed to beach access, surfing, boating, diving, etc., the city of San Diego will take it on the chin. See here. http://www.spearboard.com/showthread.php?t=93285
__________________
A spearo, but we are in this MLPA mess together |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
|
Hey guys,
I presented the kayak safety fishing video at the last MLPA meeting. Would it make any sense to have this video presented at the Council Meeting? I'm nowhere near San Diego, but I hope to fish La Jolla for a yellow tail in October. I could make the meeting and hopefully catch a fish. Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Olivenhain Bob
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Olivenhain, CA
Posts: 1,122
|
As usual, I can't make the meeting but will send out some emails. There is another way of posting your opinion. Visit this site http://www.sandiego.gov/city-clerk/o...tcomment.shtml
and you can write a comment that will be shared with the appropriate folks. I know someone reads these because I got an email back from the clerk who distributes the comments asking me which agenda item my comments were concerning. They only let you have 200 words which makes it difficult to get your point across, so use your words well. In case anyone is interested, this is what I wrote. "This action item is a thinly disguised attempt to con the Council into supporting a harmful agenda being pushed by some narrowly focused special interest groups. Despite statements to the contrary in paragraphs 2 and 5 of this proposed resolution, the suggested MLPA closures are not supported by scientific research. In fact, the statements in paragraph 2 are bald faced lies. Sensible regulation of the commercial fishing industry and dramatic reductions in pollution have resulted in the California coastal fisheries being healthier today than in any time during the last fifty years. ffice ![]() Should the MLPA closures become law, recreational fishing along most of the coast of California will be outlawed. If this is allowed to happen, entire industries based on this resource will disappear. The cost to the state and individual cities will be untold millions of dollars in lost tax revenue, as these businesses are forced to close. There will also be enormous enforcement costs that someone will have to pay. The MLPA closures are poorly conceived and not supported by the science. This proposal is not supported by most citizens and should not be blessed by the San Diego City Council. Please do not approve this resolution." Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Ho
Posts: 1,382
|
Quote:
That Video was powerful, please bring it down. If you are in the neighborhood and want to fish LJ I'd gladly fish with you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|