![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Olivenhain Bob
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Olivenhain, CA
Posts: 1,122
|
Cali,
Others might be able to answer this question better than I but the main reason I went this route was that when I pulled up my old transducer I found that the goop that had attached it to the hull was full of bubbles. I was never very happy with the performance of my previous FF and have been told that it is important that no bubbles form in the goop as they are likely to cause poor performance. I have also learned that the most efficient transmitter of sonar signals is water and that for best performance a transducer should be mounted in the water. For some strange reason the hull of a boat does not seem to cause any transmission problems so mounting the transducer in a pool of water inside the hull works very well. This is probably because the density of the hull is fairly close to the density of water. Anyway, many of the guys who really know what they are doing have gone to the "wet mount" over goop. The problem with the installation method that most have employed up to now is that with the foam version of the wet mount, the water can leak away causing the transducer to perform poorly. I have seen guys on the water having to open their hatch from time to time to add water to the foam well. I wanted to avoid having to worry about this. My version solves the leakage problem as the whole unit is sealed so the water cannot leak or evaporate. As a bonus, since the transducer is mounted in the rubber cap, it is easily portable to another location making it possible for one FF to be used on multiple boats. Give it a try. The installation is easy and the materials cost only a few dollars. Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita
Posts: 770
|
![]()
Looks like a great setup! I've always preferred my wet mount over goop, but filling up the reservoir (or as crabkracker said, forgetting to) is a pain. I haven't had any leaks, but I noticed after about 2 years the pool noodle foam is degrading a little bit and the transducer slips out when I'm driving with the yak upside down. This setup should fix both those problems. This install is going to be my project for tomorrow! Thanks for the info!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 753
|
Wet Trans...
Bob,
I just finished my install of the wet transducer (copied yours). Unfortunately, with the Lowrance transducer, you need to use the ABS 4in male adapter vs. 3in adapter. This sucks because one; its quiet a bit larger, and secondly, the 3 in. cap is flexible while the 4in cap is rigid...(sounds kind of West Hollywood-ish). My only issue is going to be removing the cap to check for water levels. I am afraid I might eventually separate the ABS adapter from the hull since the cap is so rigid and difficult to remove. Also, last question. Did you sanitize the GOOP in the interior of the adapter (seepage) or do you think it matters? I am guessing with all glue and adhesives, as they dry air bubbles appear......what do ya think??? Anyway, thanks for you expertise!
__________________
GO ARMY BEAT NAVY! Bad decisions make great stories! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guerro Grande
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
__________________
Douglas Gaxiola |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 753
|
Thanks...I think I might give the inspection plug a shot.....Any recommendations on how to clean the GOOP of my transducer? What a royal pain in the ass......I am tempted to just go buy another one!
__________________
GO ARMY BEAT NAVY! Bad decisions make great stories! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 186
|
that is slicker than shit. I have the scupper transducer in my trident, but have two other kayaks where that would totally be perfect. and the portable part of it is way cool. yes, there is a better mousetrap
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Olivenhain Bob
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Olivenhain, CA
Posts: 1,122
|
Wahoo,
I don't think having a rigid or rubber cap makes much of a difference. Most of the rigid ones are threaded so you could end up with some fairly twisted cables unless you pre-twist the opposite way before you put the cap on. Just make sure the transponder is pointed the right direction when you have things tightened down. I think a rubber cap with hose clamp is a better way to go. You cannot secure a non-threaded rigid cap with a hose clamp the way you can with rubber. You should be able to find a larger rubber cap somewhere. The inspection plug is a good idea. I had a problem with my FF last time out and thought that the water may have run dry. In ended up having to loosen the hose clamp while on the water to remove the cap to check things out, (it was a PITA). I discovered that there was still plenty of water, however. After putting everything back together, the FF worked fine. Maybe it was just a glitch in the unit. I think I will add a fill hole to my setup so I can more easily add water if it is needed at some point. As for cleaning the goop off, I don't have any recommendations. It probably is not necessary to get it all off. You just need to carve away any areas that have bubbles. Is there a solvent for Goop? Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|